Hi Christian,
not sure why you label them as neoliberal declarations. I saw many and
knowing some of their authors I doubt that they are defending such point of
views.
you can find here a longer list and comparison
http://bestbits.net/issue-comparison-of-major-declarations-on-internet-freedom/
I
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Christian Fuchs wrote:
> Thanks for the collection.
>
> On the one hand I do not see why one should stop declaring and petitioning
> as long as the world is bad and the Internet endangered.
>
I agree with you, but given that yours is posted as an Avaaz petition, i
On 04/03/2014 03:36 PM, Christian Fuchs wrote:
> Thanks for the collection.
>
*** Indeed, thanks a lot.
> On the one hand I do not see why one should stop declaring and
> petitioning as long as the world is bad and the Internet endangered.
>
*** Indeed, and that's part of the "problem" of unity th
Thanks for the collection.
On the one hand I do not see why one should stop declaring and
petitioning as long as the world is bad and the Internet endangered.
On the other hand there is a qualitative difference between neoliberal
declarations that want to fully open up the Internet to corpora
Just out of curiosity, why another Declaration? Don't get me wrong, I
don't think there's any harm here, but there are at least half a dozen
similar projects, most of which have been done in the past few years. See:
1994:
http://www.pff.org/issues-pubs/futureinsights/fi1.2magnacarta.html
1996:
The information society, the Internet and the media are today largely
controlled by large corporations such as Google and Facebook and a
state-industrial complex. The control mechanisms unveiled by Edward
Snowden, the closure of and attack against public service media,
repression against critca
