On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 04:02:15PM -0700, Mike Perry wrote:
> YaCY and other FOSS engines (in a sibling thread someone mentioned
> another that I already forgot) are also something that I will accept
> search plugins for the Omnibox, but their result quality, index depth,
> and crawl frequency are
On 27/06/13 01:02, Mike Perry wrote:
> The Doctor:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 06/24/2013 09:16 PM, Daniel Sieradski wrote:
>>> Has there ever been any effort to create an open source search
>>> engine that is entirely transparent in both its software and
>>> practi
The Doctor:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/24/2013 09:16 PM, Daniel Sieradski wrote:
> > Has there ever been any effort to create an open source search
> > engine that is entirely transparent in both its software and
> > practices? (dmoz.org
> doesn't count!)
>
> ...Y
Jacob Appelbaum:
> Mike Perry:
> > In terms of data confidentiality and integrity though, I think it is
> > probably true that the Tor hidden service trust root is much stronger
> > than the browser CA trust root, even given the 80bit name hash and
> > RSA-1024 sized keys (which probably are roughl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/24/2013 09:16 PM, Daniel Sieradski wrote:
> Has there ever been any effort to create an open source search
> engine that is entirely transparent in both its software and
> practices? (dmoz.org
doesn't count!)
...YaCY?
http://yacy.de/
- --
The
Quoth Mike Perry:
> I find StartPage/Google immensely superior to Duckduckgo/Bing when
> searching the "long tail" of technical material (which I do frequently).
In that case I agree StartPage probably makes sense. Search engines
are mainly useful for long tail things; for other stuff I generally
Quoth Mike Perry:
> If you're talking about attacks as strong as end-to-end correlation,
> then it turns out hidden services have similar weaknesses on that order.
> There are a number of points where the adversary can inject themselves
> either to observe or manipulate hidden service circuit const
Mike Perry:
> Nick:
>> Quoth Mike Perry:
> Hidden service circuits require ~4X as many Tor router traversals
> as normal Tor exit circuits to set up, and unlike normal Tor exit
> circuits, they are often *not* prebuilt. Once they are set up, they
> still require 2X as many Tor route
Nick:
> Quoth Mike Perry:
> > > > Hidden service circuits require ~4X as many Tor router traversals
> > > > as normal Tor exit circuits to set up, and unlike normal Tor exit
> > > > circuits, they are often *not* prebuilt. Once they are set up, they
> > > > still require 2X as many Tor router trave
>From: Mike Perry
>To: liberationtech
>Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 2:26 AM
>Subject: Re: [liberationtech] DuckDuckGo vs Startpage
>Google is also unwilling to work with us to deploy rate limiting
solutions, even if Tor were to develo
Quoth Mike Perry:
> > > Hidden service circuits require ~4X as many Tor router traversals
> > > as normal Tor exit circuits to set up, and unlike normal Tor exit
> > > circuits, they are often *not* prebuilt. Once they are set up, they
> > > still require 2X as many Tor router traversals end-to-end
Michael Carbone:
> On 06/24/2013 10:00 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
> > IxQuick has so far successfully negotiated with Google against
> > outright banning us. Google sees a spike in IxQuick traffic every
> > time we increase StartPage's prominence in TBB, and this does not
> > go unnoticed by Google.
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/24/2013 10:00 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
> Michael Carbone:
>> On 06/24/2013 08:20 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
>>> I've had a number of people tell me that they vouch for
>>> DuckDuckGo. What does this even mean? Nobody seems to be
>>> capable of rationally
On 2013-06-24, at 8:20 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
> Nadim Kobeissi:
>> I'd just like to add that I'm a DuckDuckGo user myself and that I can
>> definitely vouch for the service.
>
> I've had a number of people tell me that they vouch for DuckDuckGo. What
> does this even mean? Nobody seems to be cap
Michael Carbone:
> On 06/24/2013 08:20 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
> > I've had a number of people tell me that they vouch for DuckDuckGo.
> > What does this even mean? Nobody seems to be capable of rationally
> > explaining it.
> >
> > Have you inspected their datacenter/server security? Have you
> > a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/24/2013 08:20 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
> I've had a number of people tell me that they vouch for DuckDuckGo.
> What does this even mean? Nobody seems to be capable of rationally
> explaining it.
>
> Have you inspected their datacenter/server securi
Has there ever been any effort to create an open source search engine that is
entirely transparent in both its software and practices? (dmoz.org doesn't
count!)
--
Daniel Sieradski
d...@danielsieradski.com
http://danielsieradski.com
315.889.1444
Follow me at http://twitter.com/selfagency
Public
17 matches
Mail list logo
