On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:16:43AM -0500, Brandon Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> At least for me using it embedded with my compiler/cflags/etc (which
> include -Werror, which is what makes it a pain why I compile on targets
Well, specifying -Werror is a rather stupid thing to do (if it is gcc,
it turns gcc into a non-conforming C compiler...), and certainly isn't
supported by libev: libev cannot make workarounds for all existing
compiler warnings, there are too many compilers out there and too many
warnings that trigger on correct code.
Since it is so trivial, I have little problems with applying this
workaround, but in general, I'd like to avoid yntactical lutter that makes
maintainance harder just to compile with a deliberately broken compiler.
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
_______________________________________________
libev mailing list
libev@lists.schmorp.de
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libev
