Re: [Libevent-users] FYI: libevent/libev benchmark updated for libevent-1.4.3

2008-05-08 Thread Dan
Its to bad when people write emails like this, clearly no social skills. Yeah I suggested I was a noob just to see if he was an asshole, and guess what! :) Have a couple emails as well of him making personal attacks against my family and such, its really to bad, I feel sorry for him, but I'll

Re: new 4-heap code - please give it a try

2008-05-08 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 11:34:14AM -0500, Brandon Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've just tried it against my code, looks pretty good from here. My > test suite passes with the new code, so no breakage. Yeah, and my test suite passed as well, the problem showed only with few timers :-< >

Re: new 4-heap code - please give it a try

2008-05-08 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 05:22:03PM -0500, Brandon Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's some simple demo code that seems to exhibit the issue I'm seeing > with cvs's timers, using two single-shot timers of 3 and 10 seconds. > Switching the order of the ev_timer_start()s makes it behave bette

Re: [Libevent-users] FYI: libevent/libev benchmark updated for libevent-1.4.3

2008-05-08 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 12:03:06AM -0500, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Think I tried Ev once, to many bugs, hell couldn't even set a timer within > a timer as I remember, In no release ever was there such a bug. libev and EV are used in many production environments and projects, too and ha

Re: [Libevent-users] FYI: libevent/libev benchmark updated for libevent-1.4.3

2008-05-08 Thread Dan
Think I tried Ev once, to many bugs, hell couldn't even set a timer within a timer as I remember, This EV stuff just meant to undermine the hardwork of the folks at libevent? Dan. On Wed, 7 May 2008, Marc Lehmann wrote: As version 1.4.3-stable of libevent uses a more efficient binary h