On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 12:56:16PM +0800, CandyMi <869646...@qq.com> wrote:
> I have the same opinion about Linux aio and io_uring. The performance of aio
> is not as good and problematic as described, but the use of io_uring may be
> limited by the version of the Linux kernel and it makes me
"While other data structures are possible and I vaguely plan some minor
optimisations"
I'm very happy to hear what you said! Because every optimization of
Timer makes it easy for developers to use without having to hold hands in some
cases (I wrote a lot of code for this).
I mentioned in
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 05:57:02PM -0400, Benjamin Mahler
wrote:
> Thanks Marc, do you have any broader comments on the implications of
> iouring for libev? It looks like iouring is finally bringing async system
> calls (not just async io) to Linux.
As far as I have been told, you will even be
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 02:44:58AM +0800, CandyMi <869646...@qq.com> wrote:
> "While other data structures are possible and I vaguely plan some minor
> optimisations"
>
> I'm very happy to hear what you said! Because every optimization of
> Timer makes it easy for developers to use without
Thanks Marc, do you have any broader comments on the implications of
iouring for libev? It looks like iouring is finally bringing async system
calls (not just async io) to Linux. Will libeio have an iouring backend
that doesn't use a thread pool and instead hands the io off to the kernel
with
