On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:39:59AM -0700, Ka-Hing Cheung wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 10:39 -0700, Nick Mathewson wrote:
but I am willing to submit another patch (the one with
accessor to base-event_gotterm/event_break) if you think that's the
better way to do it.
Probably.
Sorry
On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 10:39 -0700, Nick Mathewson wrote:
but I am willing to submit another patch (the one with
accessor to base-event_gotterm/event_break) if you think that's the
better way to do it.
Probably.
Sorry for taking so long. Attached is the promised patch which adds
accessors
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:04:52AM -0700, Ka-Hing Cheung wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 09:16 -0700, Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:42:47AM -0700, Ka-Hing Cheung wrote:
[...]
I do realize that this breaks existing assumptions about return values.
What if instead of
