On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:39:59AM -0700, Ka-Hing Cheung wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 10:39 -0700, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> > > but I am willing to submit another patch (the one with
> > > accessor to base->event_gotterm/event_break) if you think that's the
> > > better way to do it.
> >
> > Prob
On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 10:39 -0700, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> > but I am willing to submit another patch (the one with
> > accessor to base->event_gotterm/event_break) if you think that's the
> > better way to do it.
>
> Probably.
Sorry for taking so long. Attached is the promised patch which adds
a
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:04:52AM -0700, Ka-Hing Cheung wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 09:16 -0700, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:42:47AM -0700, Ka-Hing Cheung wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I do realize that this breaks existing assumptions about return values.
> > > What if inste
