Hi,
Sorry for the delayed answer.
On 20/06/11 19:52, Nick Mathewson wrote:
But since I got your attention, I'll plug a follow-up question about the
build-system: what's the reason for setting BUILD_WITH_NO_UNDEFINED only
for cygwin and win32?
I'm currently patching the packages to always
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Leo 'costela' Antunes
cost...@debian.org wrote:
On 17/06/11 17:42, Nick Mathewson wrote:
* AGE: With how many previous versions of the ABI is Current
version backward-compatible? This increments whenever the ABI changes
in a backward compatible way, and
Hi,
In the process of building the Debian package for 2.0.12, I noticed
Makefile.am contains VERSION_INFO=6:1:1, but the generated libs have all
SONAME=*.so.5
I'm still parsing through the build-system (I'm the new guy helping with
this package) trying to figure out what's going on, but decided
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Leo 'costela' Antunes
cost...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
In the process of building the Debian package for 2.0.12, I noticed
Makefile.am contains VERSION_INFO=6:1:1, but the generated libs have all
SONAME=*.so.5
I'm still parsing through the build-system (I'm the
