Re: [Libevent-users] Sigprocmask vs pthread_sigprocmask

2007-02-22 Thread Niels Provos
Do you have an addition to the regression test that would allow me to verify that the new code works as intended? If not, it would be most appreciated :-) Niels. On 2/22/07, Scott Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 21, 2007, at 1:29 AM, William Ahern wrote: On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at

Re: [Libevent-users] Sigprocmask vs pthread_sigprocmask

2007-02-22 Thread Scott Lamb
On Feb 22, 2007, at 6:32 PM, Niels Provos wrote: Do you have an addition to the regression test that would allow me to verify that the new code works as intended? If not, it would be most appreciated :-) There is one that verifies the quickly received signal case. Are you talking about

[Libevent-users] Sigprocmask vs pthread_sigprocmask

2007-02-21 Thread Nick Mathewson
Hi, all. There's been a recent exchange on the Tor development list about the intersection of signals with pthreads with libevent. Both posts are (I hope) concise, so I'll link to them here: http://archives.seul.org/or/dev/Feb-2007/msg00028.html