On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 02:08:40PM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> >With SIGPIPE the answer is simple, though. Block the signal from the main
> >thread before creating any other threads. All threads will inherit the
> >block, and SIGPIPE can never squeeze through.
>
> I think you mean *ignore* S
Hi!
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 12:52:51AM -0800, William Ahern wrote:
>Signal handlers and masks are inherited across fork() and pthread_create().
>And masks are inherited across exec(), too, I think.
>You could add code to each thread to do this. Of course, there are race
>conditions. Imagine if a
William Ahern schreef:
>
> Signal handlers and masks are inherited across fork() and pthread_create().
> And masks are inherited across exec(), too, I think.
>
Yes, of course, I should've thought of that myself.
> You could add code to each thread to do this. Of course, there are race
> condit
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 08:51:55AM +0100, Ron Arts wrote:
> Oops, I'm sorry, I did not make myself clear, while writing the
> email I edited it a lot, and forgot to mention that indeed I
> ignore SIGPIPE in my initialisation code:
>
>
> But my program is still being killed with SIGPIPE occasion
William Ahern wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 01:06:30AM +0100, Ron Arts wrote:
Hi,
I am using libevent in a multithreaded program, the main
thread containing the libevent loop, and other threads
doing disk I/O. From mail from this list, and the changelogs
I was under the impression that libeven
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 01:06:30AM +0100, Ron Arts wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using libevent in a multithreaded program, the main
> thread containing the libevent loop, and other threads
> doing disk I/O. From mail from this list, and the changelogs
> I was under the impression that libevent handles si
