Crumbs .. Yes .. I don't even know how to review this.
I have a set of (non-upstream) virt-v2v tests against Windows guests
which I will start running now. They usually take many hours to run,
and also I'm on holiday tomorrow. That should hopefully tell me if it
completely breaks stuff or
It turned out (by trial and error) that for Windows >= 8 / 2012, even
though the PnP system uses names related to the original driver's .inf
file for certain entries under DriverDatabase registry subtree, this
doesn't have to hold for the storage driver to make it boot.
So use our own artificial
The patch to the Windows registry allowing it to boot off a virtio-blk
drive was initially conceived by comparing the state with virtio-blk
driver properly installed, to that without.
However, we don't want to replicate the Windows PnP system; rather we
need to apply just enough edits to make the
The patch to the Windows registry allowing it to boot off a virtio-blk
drive was initially conceived by comparing the state with virtio-blk
driver properly installed, to that without.
However, we don't want to replicate the Windows PnP system; rather we
need to apply just enough edits to make the
Refactor registry patching to share common parts between Win <= 7 and
Win >= 8. Also branch between the two based on the presence of the
DriverDatabase subtree rather than on the OS version, which allows not
to pass the inspect handle into the functions.
OTOH make the patching functions accept
The way we patch the Windows registry in order to allow it to boot off a
virtio-blk drive was initially conceived by comparing the state with
virtio-blk driver properly installed, to that without.
However, we don't want to replicate the Windows PnP system; rather we
need to apply just enough
Ensure libtsk is available at compile time.
If not, daemon routines depending on it won't be available.
Signed-off-by: Matteo Cafasso
---
docs/guestfs-building.pod | 4
m4/guestfs_daemon.m4 | 8
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git
Library's counterpart of the daemon's internal_filesystem_walk command.
It writes the daemon's command output on a temporary file and parses it,
deserialising the XDR formatted tsk_dirent structs.
It returns to the caller the list of tsk_dirent structs generated by the
internal_filesystem_walk
v4:
- Changed tsk_allocated struct field into tsk_flags.
- Added optional dependency in documentation.
- Use asprintf and perror instead of asprintf_nowarn and fprintf.
- Ensure CLEANUP_FREE vars are initialised.
- Reworked the function documentation.
- Improved tests robustness.
The tsk_dirent struct contains the information gathered via TSK APIs.
The struct contains the following fields:
* tsk_inode: inode of a file
* tsk_type: type of file such as for dirwalk command
* tsk_size: file size in bytes
* tsk_name: path relative to its disk partition
* tsk_flags:
The internal_filesystem_walk command walks through the FS structures
of a disk partition and returns all the files or directories
which could be found.
The command is able to retrieve information regarding deleted
or unaccessible files where other commands such as stat or find
would fail.
The
The tests check whether the filesystem_walk command is able to retrieve
information regarding both existing and deleted files.
A NTFS image is used as Ext3+ filesystems deletion is more aggressive
in terms of metadata removal.
Signed-off-by: Matteo Cafasso
---
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 11:24:03AM +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 11:43 +0300, Roman Kagan wrote:
> > I think this would be better addressed if you could disable PnP
> > manager
> > prompts globally during v2v, and reset it back in a firstboot script
> > after your
On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 11:43 +0300, Roman Kagan wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 10:13:35AM +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> > The problem with running after the PnP is that user will be
> > prompted
> > for installation of virtio-net and virtio-balloon drivers... which
> > doesn't make sense as we
On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 10:54 +0300, Roman Kagan wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 09:16:16AM +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 21:08 +0300, Roman Kagan wrote:
> > > > I'll talk to our guys doing similar things. I wonder what they
> > > > do
> > > > --
> > > > they must have
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 09:16:16AM +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 21:08 +0300, Roman Kagan wrote:
> > > I'll talk to our guys doing similar things. I wonder what they do
> > > --
> > > they must have similar problems.
> >
> > Indeed they do. The solution we're
On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 21:08 +0300, Roman Kagan wrote:
> > I'll talk to our guys doing similar things. I wonder what they do
> > --
> > they must have similar problems.
>
> Indeed they do. The solution we're considering ATM is
>
> 1) make the installer support running on a system where the
17 matches
Mail list logo