On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 09:21:26PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> +and libvirt_qemu_user () =
> + let uid =
> +lazy (
...
> +) in
> + Lazy.force uid
Bleah, this but without the obviously bogus use of lazy(). I've fixed
this in my local copy.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones,
When using the libvirt backend and running as root, libvirt will run
qemu as a non-root user (eg. qemu:qemu). The v2v directory stores NBD
endpoints that qemu must be able to open and so we set the directory
to mode 0711. Unfortunately this permits any non-root user to open
the sockets (since,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 05:46:18PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 05:34:25PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > Is it OK if we pass "+107" to "setfacl" here?
>
> Yes it works fine. The "+" is a surprise feature of getpwnam(3) in fact,
> albeit one which doesn't appear to
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 05:34:25PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Is it OK if we pass "+107" to "setfacl" here?
Yes it works fine. The "+" is a surprise feature of getpwnam(3) in fact,
albeit one which doesn't appear to be documented in the man page.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 05:10:07PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 03/22/22 15:35, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > When using the libvirt backend and running as root, libvirt will run
> > qemu as a non-root user (eg. qemu:qemu). The v2v directory stores NBD
> > endpoints that qemu must be able to
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 05:34:25PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 03/22/22 16:48, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > When using the libvirt backend and running as root, libvirt will run
> > qemu as a non-root user (eg. qemu:qemu). The v2v directory stores NBD
> > endpoints that qemu must be able to
On 03/22/22 16:48, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> When using the libvirt backend and running as root, libvirt will run
> qemu as a non-root user (eg. qemu:qemu). The v2v directory stores NBD
> endpoints that qemu must be able to open and so we set the directory
> to mode 0711. Unfortunately this
On 03/22/22 15:51, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 02:35:54PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> For fuller explanation see:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066773#c1
>>
>> I'm not very happy with this patch for a few reasons:
>>
>> - Does every distro use
On 03/22/22 15:35, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> When using the libvirt backend and running as root, libvirt will run
> qemu as a non-root user (eg. qemu:qemu). The v2v directory stores NBD
> endpoints that qemu must be able to open and so we set the directory
> to mode 0711. Unfortunately this
When using the libvirt backend and running as root, libvirt will run
qemu as a non-root user (eg. qemu:qemu). The v2v directory stores NBD
endpoints that qemu must be able to open and so we set the directory
to mode 0711. Unfortunately this permits any non-root user to open
the sockets (since,
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 06:14:23PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 05:00:47PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 02:40:45PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> > wrote:
> > > > Simple reply message
> > > >
> > > > The simple reply message MUST
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 02:35:54PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> For fuller explanation see:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066773#c1
>
> I'm not very happy with this patch for a few reasons:
>
> - Does every distro use "qemu" as the user that runs qemu?
Not sure, but you
When using the libvirt backend and running as root, libvirt will run
qemu as a non-root user (eg. qemu:qemu). The v2v directory stores NBD
endpoints that qemu must be able to open and so we set the directory
to mode 0711. Unfortunately this permits any non-root user to open
the sockets (since,
For fuller explanation see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066773#c1
I'm not very happy with this patch for a few reasons:
- Does every distro use "qemu" as the user that runs qemu?
- Having to run an external process (not a big deal, but a bit clumsy)
- Aren't ACLs actually
14 matches
Mail list logo
