Re: [Libguestfs] redhat-based EL9 distros not supported?

2022-10-07 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 04:33:01PM +, Harry Bryson wrote: > Prior to Enterprise Linux 9, it seems some Red Hat based distros returned > "redhat-based" for inspect-get-distro > This allowed things like "virt-customize --firstboot-command" to work as this > matched the supported distro list,

[Libguestfs] redhat-based EL9 distros not supported?

2022-10-07 Thread Harry Bryson
Prior to Enterprise Linux 9, it seems some Red Hat based distros returned "redhat-based" for inspect-get-distro This allowed things like "virt-customize --firstboot-command" to work as this matched the supported distro list, e.g. |

[Libguestfs] libnbd | Failed pipeline for master | c5a40426

2022-10-07 Thread GitLab
Pipeline #661196007 has failed! Project: libnbd ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd ) Branch: master ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/commits/master ) Commit: c5a40426 ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/commit/c5a40426405d78586cb75bf4e5c23d41c4afea8b ) Commit Message: Merge branch

Re: [Libguestfs] [libnbd PATCH] RFC: fuzzing: Break up handshake into more steps

2022-10-07 Thread Eric Blake
On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 01:51:05PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Thinking about ways to expose even more code-paths, I wonder if we > > could tweak the client along the lines of: > > > > if (rand () & 1) > > nbd_set_handshake_flags (nbd, rand ()); > > if (rand () & 1) > >

Re: [Libguestfs] [libnbd PATCH] RFC: fuzzing: Break up handshake into more steps

2022-10-07 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 07:37:19AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 10:22:57AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 04:34:52PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > > > Give the fuzzer a few more points to experiment with added branching > > > by explicitly using opt

Re: [Libguestfs] [libnbd PATCH] RFC: fuzzing: Break up handshake into more steps

2022-10-07 Thread Eric Blake
On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 10:22:57AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 04:34:52PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > > Give the fuzzer a few more points to experiment with added branching > > by explicitly using opt mode. > > --- > > > > I'm not quite sure whether the fuzzer is

[Libguestfs] libnbd | Failed pipeline for master | 8592caba

2022-10-07 Thread GitLab
Pipeline #661075654 has failed! Project: libnbd ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd ) Branch: master ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/commits/master ) Commit: 8592caba ( https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/libnbd/-/commit/8592cabaf5e14b73f53d4d3bb406c291fd40d0cc ) Commit Message: fuzzing: Break up

Re: [Libguestfs] [libnbd PATCH] RFC: fuzzing: Break up handshake into more steps

2022-10-07 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 10/06/22 23:34, Eric Blake wrote: > Give the fuzzer a few more points to experiment with added branching > by explicitly using opt mode. > --- > > I'm not quite sure whether the fuzzer is able to synthesize specific > API calls from the client side; but if it can, letting the client >

Re: [Libguestfs] [libnbd PATCH] RFC: fuzzing: Break up handshake into more steps

2022-10-07 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 04:34:52PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > Give the fuzzer a few more points to experiment with added branching > by explicitly using opt mode. > --- > > I'm not quite sure whether the fuzzer is able to synthesize specific > API calls from the client side; but if it can,