On 9/5/23 16:57, Eric Blake wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 11:09:02AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
+static inline int64_t
+human_size_parse (const char *str,
+ const char **error, const char **pstr)
+{
+ int64_t size;
+ char *end;
+
On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 11:09:02AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > +static inline int64_t
> > > +human_size_parse (const char *str,
> > > + const char **error, const char **pstr)
> > > +{
> > > + int64_t size;
> > > + char *end;
> > > + uint64_t scale = 1;
> > > +
> > >
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 09:52:53AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 9/3/23 17:22, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > This is broadly simple code motion, intended so that we can reuse the
> > same code in libnbd.
> > ---
> > common/include/Makefile.am | 6 ++
> > common/include/human-size.h
On 9/3/23 17:22, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> This is broadly simple code motion, intended so that we can reuse the
> same code in libnbd.
> ---
> common/include/Makefile.am | 6 ++
> common/include/human-size.h | 137 +++
> common/include/test-human-size.c
This is broadly simple code motion, intended so that we can reuse the
same code in libnbd.
---
common/include/Makefile.am | 6 ++
common/include/human-size.h | 137 +++
common/include/test-human-size.c | 133 ++
server/public.c
This is the first part of a pair of patch series which aim to let us
use nbdkit_parse_size (or rather, an equivalent common function) in
nbdcopy, so we can write:
nbdcopy --request-size=32M ...
We can't do that now which was annoying me earlier in the week.
This commit creates a new function
