On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 02:57:50PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 08:48:28AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 9/11/19 5:40 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > Very much a work in progress as there are still many tests using
> > > qemu-io which are candidates for
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 08:48:28AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 9/11/19 5:40 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Very much a work in progress as there are still many tests using
> > qemu-io which are candidates for conversion.
> >
> > You'll notice at the end of test-full.sh that the new test has
On 9/11/19 5:40 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> nbdsh has some advantages over qemu-io:
>
> - scriptable
>
> - allows us to more finely control NBD commands, such as
>making subsector-sized requests and controlling how
>many commands are sent on the wire
>
> - can write controlled
On 9/11/19 5:40 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Very much a work in progress as there are still many tests using
> qemu-io which are candidates for conversion.
>
> You'll notice at the end of test-full.sh that the new test has some
> duplicated code which looks as if it ought to be refactored
nbdsh has some advantages over qemu-io:
- scriptable
- allows us to more finely control NBD commands, such as
making subsector-sized requests and controlling how
many commands are sent on the wire
- can write controlled patterns
- can read NBD export flags
---
README
Very much a work in progress as there are still many tests using
qemu-io which are candidates for conversion.
You'll notice at the end of test-full.sh that the new test has some
duplicated code which looks as if it ought to be refactored into a
Python function. When I tried to do that, I got
