On 9/21/23 22:58, Eric Blake wrote:
> If a server replies to a block status command with an invalid count in
> NBD_REPLY_TYPE_BLOCK_STATUS_EXT, we correctly detect the server's
> error, but fail to mark that we've consumed enough data off the wire
> to resync back to the server's next reply.
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 03:58:04PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> If a server replies to a block status command with an invalid count in
> NBD_REPLY_TYPE_BLOCK_STATUS_EXT, we correctly detect the server's
> error, but fail to mark that we've consumed enough data off the wire
> to resync back to the
If a server replies to a block status command with an invalid count in
NBD_REPLY_TYPE_BLOCK_STATUS_EXT, we correctly detect the server's
error, but fail to mark that we've consumed enough data off the wire
to resync back to the server's next reply. Rich's fuzzing run
initially found this, but I
