On 6/30/23 09:38, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 09:32:33AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 6/29/23 19:16, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 06:40:27PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>
Either way, I can restore the parens. Do you want me to submit a v3?
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 09:32:33AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 6/29/23 19:16, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 06:40:27PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> >> Either way, I can restore the parens. Do you want me to submit a v3?
> >
> > I think the parens are clearer. Don't
On 6/29/23 19:16, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 06:40:27PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> Either way, I can restore the parens. Do you want me to submit a v3?
>
> I think the parens are clearer. Don't need a v3, thanks!
Can I add your R-b that way (with the parens
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 06:40:27PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 6/29/23 17:48, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 05:39:34PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >> On 6/29/23 14:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 02:34:42PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
On 6/29/23 17:48, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 05:39:34PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 6/29/23 14:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 02:34:42PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Currently "chown_for_libvirt_rhbz_1045069" is best effort; if it fails,
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 05:39:34PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 6/29/23 14:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 02:34:42PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >> Currently "chown_for_libvirt_rhbz_1045069" is best effort; if it fails, we
> >> suppress the exception (we log it in
On 6/29/23 14:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 02:34:42PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> Currently "chown_for_libvirt_rhbz_1045069" is best effort; if it fails, we
>> suppress the exception (we log it in verbose mode only, even).
>>
>> That's not proved helpful: it almost
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 02:34:42PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Currently "chown_for_libvirt_rhbz_1045069" is best effort; if it fails, we
> suppress the exception (we log it in verbose mode only, even).
>
> That's not proved helpful: it almost certainly leads to later errors, but
> those errors
Currently "chown_for_libvirt_rhbz_1045069" is best effort; if it fails, we
suppress the exception (we log it in verbose mode only, even).
That's not proved helpful: it almost certainly leads to later errors, but
those errors are less clear than the original (suppressed) exception.
Namely, the
