On 07/22/22 11:35, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 09:36:27AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> When the source domain doesn't specify a VCPU model ("s_cpu_model" is
>> None), and the guest OS is assumed to work with the default VCPU model
>> ("gcaps_default_cpu" is true), we don't
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 12:53:00PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 01:49:21PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > On 07/22/22 11:50, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:42:48AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:34:44AM
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 01:49:21PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 07/22/22 11:50, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:42:48AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:34:44AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>> Sorry for the delayed response to
On 07/22/22 11:50, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:42:48AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:34:44AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> Sorry for the delayed response to this. I see you've posted an
>>> updated patch, so this is just a bit of
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:42:48AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:34:44AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Sorry for the delayed response to this. I see you've posted an
> > updated patch, so this is just a bit of FYI.
> >
> > I originally added CPU modelling
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:34:44AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Sorry for the delayed response to this. I see you've posted an
> updated patch, so this is just a bit of FYI.
>
> I originally added CPU modelling in commit 11505e4b84 (March 2017):
>
>
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 09:36:27AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> When the source domain doesn't specify a VCPU model ("s_cpu_model" is
> None), and the guest OS is assumed to work with the default VCPU model
> ("gcaps_default_cpu" is true), we don't output any element. In that
> case, libvirtd
Sorry for the delayed response to this. I see you've posted an
updated patch, so this is just a bit of FYI.
I originally added CPU modelling in commit 11505e4b84 (March 2017):
https://github.com/libguestfs/virt-v2v/commit/11505e4b84ce8d7eda4e2a275fdcecc5f2a3288d
What we were actually trying to
When the source domain doesn't specify a VCPU model ("s_cpu_model" is
None), and the guest OS is assumed to work with the default VCPU model
("gcaps_default_cpu" is true), we don't output any element. In that
case, libvirtd augments the domain config with:
[1]
qemu64
where the
