On 12/20/22 11:51, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 12/19/22 23:16, Andrey Drobyshev wrote:
>
>> Now I'm a bit confused myself as a result of our discussion: should we
>> really give priority to BIOS Boot partition? Because I tried to
>> replay the opposite scenario -- i.e. to convert a disk previously
According to [1], there're different ways to specify which firmware is
to be used by a libvirt-driven VM. Namely, there's an automatic
firmware selection, e.g.:
...
...
and a manual one, e.g.:
...
/usr/share/OVMF/OVMF_CODE.fd
...
...
with the
On 12/20/22 12:07, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> On 12/19/22 19:59, Andrey Drobyshev wrote:
>> According to [1], there're different ways to specify which firmware is
>> to be used by a libvirt-driven VM. Namely, there's an automatic
>> firmware selection, e.g.:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
BTW I'm on holiday, and I'm quite happy to go with whatever Laszlo
agrees with. He is also able to push it upstream.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder
Hi Andrey,
On 12/19/22 19:59, Andrey Drobyshev wrote:
> According to [1], there're different ways to specify which firmware is
> to be used by a libvirt-driven VM. Namely, there's an automatic
> firmware selection, e.g.:
>
> ...
>
> ...
>
> and a manual one, e.g.:
>
> ...
>
On 12/19/22 23:16, Andrey Drobyshev wrote:
> Now I'm a bit confused myself as a result of our discussion: should we
> really give priority to BIOS Boot partition? Because I tried to
> replay the opposite scenario -- i.e. to convert a disk previously used
> by BIOS machine to be used by UEFI
