Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH libguestfs-common 2/2] mlcustomize: Fall back to autorelabel if specfile does not exist (RHBZ#1828952).

On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 10:58:12 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:12:29AM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > On Tuesday, 5 May 2020 17:44:15 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828952#c2 > > > > I think we need to do a

Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH libguestfs-common 2/2] mlcustomize: Fall back to autorelabel if specfile does not exist (RHBZ#1828952).

On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:12:29AM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > On Tuesday, 5 May 2020 17:44:15 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828952#c2 > > I think we need to do a different approach than this patch. > > The biggest thing is that currently we

Re: [Libguestfs] [PATCH libguestfs-common 2/2] mlcustomize: Fall back to autorelabel if specfile does not exist (RHBZ#1828952).

On Tuesday, 5 May 2020 17:44:15 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828952#c2 I think we need to do a different approach than this patch. The biggest thing is that currently we check only SELINUXTYPE for the actual policy, however we do not check SELINUX

[Libguestfs] [PATCH libguestfs-common 2/2] mlcustomize: Fall back to autorelabel if specfile does not exist (RHBZ#1828952).

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828952#c2 If SELINUXTYPE is set to some value other than targeted then we look for a directory /etc/selinux/ which does not exist. However this should not cause a fatal error. Using setfiles to do the relabelling immediately is a nice-to-have, but we