[I've no idea about this, adding Eric to CC for attention]
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 03:11:42PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> F_SETFD takes an "int", so it stands to reason that FD_CLOEXEC expands to
> an "int". In turn, it's bad hygiene to manipulate the sign bit of (signed)
> integers with bit
F_SETFD takes an "int", so it stands to reason that FD_CLOEXEC expands to
an "int". In turn, it's bad hygiene to manipulate the sign bit of (signed)
integers with bit operations:
~FD_CLOEXEC
Convert FD_CLOEXEC to "unsigned int" for the bitwise complement operator:
~(unsigned)FD_CLOEXEC
The
