Re: [Libguestfs] [v2v PATCH v2] output/create_libvirt_xml: relax VCPU feature checking for "qemu64"

2022-07-22 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 07/22/22 11:35, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 09:36:27AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> When the source domain doesn't specify a VCPU model ("s_cpu_model" is >> None), and the guest OS is assumed to work with the default VCPU model >> ("gcaps_default_cpu" is true), we don't

Re: [Libguestfs] [v2v PATCH v2] output/create_libvirt_xml: relax VCPU feature checking for "qemu64"

2022-07-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 09:36:27AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > When the source domain doesn't specify a VCPU model ("s_cpu_model" is > None), and the guest OS is assumed to work with the default VCPU model > ("gcaps_default_cpu" is true), we don't output any element. In that > case, libvirtd

[Libguestfs] [v2v PATCH v2] output/create_libvirt_xml: relax VCPU feature checking for "qemu64"

2022-07-22 Thread Laszlo Ersek
When the source domain doesn't specify a VCPU model ("s_cpu_model" is None), and the guest OS is assumed to work with the default VCPU model ("gcaps_default_cpu" is true), we don't output any element. In that case, libvirtd augments the domain config with: [1] qemu64 where the