On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:59:11AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:25:33AM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > On Friday, 16 June 2017 16:58:53 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 03:24:55PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, 15 June
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:25:33AM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> On Friday, 16 June 2017 16:58:53 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 03:24:55PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 15 June 2017 19:05:55 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > Those cleanups which
On Friday, 16 June 2017 16:58:53 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 03:24:55PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > On Thursday, 15 June 2017 19:05:55 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > Those cleanups which only depend on libc, gnulib or libxml2 are split
> > > out into a
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 03:24:55PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 June 2017 19:05:55 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Those cleanups which only depend on libc, gnulib or libxml2 are split
> > out into a separate common/cleanups directory.
> > ---
>
> IMHO a single cleanups.c
On Thursday, 15 June 2017 19:05:55 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Those cleanups which only depend on libc, gnulib or libxml2 are split
> out into a separate common/cleanups directory.
> ---
IMHO a single cleanups.c source should be enough, otherwise it's overly
split...
--
Pino Toscano
