[SPAM] 2009北京国际减灾应急技术设备博览会

2009±±¾©¹ú¼Ê¼õÔÖÓ¦¼±¼¼ÊõÉ豸²©ÀÀ»á µç»°£º021-34080087 ´«Õ棺021-34080380 ÁªÏµÈË£ºÓÚ²¨²¨£º13917722982 °ìչʱ¼ä£º2009Äê08ÔÂ20ÈÕ-22ÈÕ ¾Ù°ìµØµã£ºÖйú¹ú¼ÊÕ¹ÀÀÖÐÐÄ¡¤Öйú Åú×¼µ¥Î»£ºÖйúÉÌÎñ²¿£¨ÉÌóÅú[2008] 227ºÅ£© Ö÷°ìµ¥Î»£º ÉÌÎñ²¿Íâó·¢Õ¹ÊÂÎñ¾Ö ÖйúÔÖº¦·ÀÓùЭ»á ÃñÕþ²¿¹ú¼Ò¼õÔÖÖÐÐÄ ÈÕÖо­Ã³½»Á÷ÖÐÐÄ º«¹ú·À

Re: [Libhugetlbfs-devel] [PATCH] hugeadm: Retry allocation of hugepages to static pool on failure when --hard is specified

Mel Gorman wrote: On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:53:39PM -0700, Avantika Mathur wrote: Patch cleaniness issues. Not a massive deal here but a kernel submission patch would attract complaint and we try and keep to the same standard. Rename subject to something like hugeadm: Retry allocation of

[Libhugetlbfs-devel] [SPAM] Discount for

Hi, libhugetlbfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Check Rxontop. com Best, maurits Boespflug - You said, Stephen answered, O, it's only Dedalus whose mother is -- Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and F

[Libhugetlbfs-devel] [麦拉建筑圈] cnfair邀请你加 入麦拉建筑圈，并成为TA的好友

PHRhYmxlIGNlbGxzcGFjaW5nPSIwIiBjZWxscGFkZGluZz0iMjAiPg0KPHRyPjx0ZD4NCjx0YWJs ZSB3aWR0aD0iNTAwIiBjZWxsc3BhY2luZz0iMCIgY2VsbHBhZGRpbmc9IjEiPg0KPHRyPjx0ZCBi Z2NvbG9yPSIjRkY4RTAwIiBhbGlnbj0ibGVmdCIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OidsdWNpZGEg Z3JhbmRlJyx0YWhvbWEsJ2JpdHN0cmVhbSB2ZXJhIHNhbnMnLGhlbHZldGljYSxzYW5

[Libhugetlbfs-devel] [SPAM] Packed and dosed ddesire

Avoid standard mmen's troubles The horsesacrifice, o monarch, is highly cleansing why is it that if one man becomes delighted, the there is not so much as a mark on it! Said planchette, on a road, so has a person d

Re: [Libhugetlbfs-devel] [PATCH] hugeadm hard flag

> > int opt_dry_run = 0; > > Total aside, opt_dry_run appears to be totally dead in this C file. Who > sets it? > It is set by specifying --dry-run or -d. Thanks, Eric signature.asc Description: Digital signature --

Re: [Libhugetlbfs-devel] [PATCH] hugeadm hard flag

On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:53:39PM -0700, Avantika Mathur wrote: > I appreciate any comments! > Patch cleaniness issues. Not a massive deal here but a kernel submission patch would attract complaint and we try and keep to the same standard. Rename subject to something like hugeadm: Retry allocat

Re: [Libhugetlbfs-devel] [PATCH] hugeadm hard flag

On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Avantika Mathur wrote: > I appreciate any comments! > > thank you, > > Avantika > Looks good. There is one thing that I think should be discussed. Should we require that the --hard flag is specified before the --pool-pages-min flag? It would require a bit of a rewrite to ha