On 2014-12-15 05:37, Petr Holasek wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Dec 2014, Eric B Munson wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Petr Holasek wrote:
>>
>> > zero_filesize_segment tescase fails on s390x with segfault because program
>> > header virtual address is set to very low value below zSeries default
>> > 0x800
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014, Eric B Munson wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Petr Holasek wrote:
>
> > zero_filesize_segment tescase fails on s390x with segfault because program
> > header virtual address is set to very low value below zSeries default
> > 0x8000 address.
> >
> > I haven't found a way ho
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Petr Holasek wrote:
> zero_filesize_segment tescase fails on s390x with segfault because program
> header virtual address is set to very low value below zSeries default
> 0x8000 address.
>
> I haven't found a way how to set custom virtual base address on s390x since ld
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Jan Stancek"
> To: "Petr Holasek"
> Cc: libhugetlbfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, "Eric B Munson"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, 26 November, 2014 10:14:42 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] put address of zero size file segment above 0x8000
>
>
>
>
>
> - Origi
- Original Message -
> From: "Petr Holasek"
> To: libhugetlbfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: "Jan Stancek" , "Eric B Munson" ,
> phola...@redhat.com
> Sent: Tuesday, 25 November, 2014 3:00:40 PM
> Subject: [PATCH] put address of zero size file segment above 0x8000
>
> zero_fi
zero_filesize_segment tescase fails on s390x with segfault because program
header virtual address is set to very low value below zSeries default
0x8000 address.
I haven't found a way how to set custom virtual base address on s390x since ld
option --image-base is not supported there.
When the
