On (17/10/08 17:14), Andy Whitcroft didst pronounce:
> Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> Makefile |2 +-
> hugetlbfs.h |9 -
> kernel-features.c|1 +
> libhugetlbfs_privutils
This comment is not specific to this patch, but the thought came into my
head while reading this patch:
I think developers (myself included) will sometimes get confused as to
whether their new function should go into libhugetlbfs_internal.h,
libhugetlbfs_privutils.h, hugetlbfs.h, or no header at a
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Makefile |2 +-
hugetlbfs.h |9 -
kernel-features.c|1 +
libhugetlbfs_privutils.h | 10 ++
4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
i
