On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 09:57:10AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 15:43 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 09:39:29PM +, Adam Litke wrote:
> > > In some cases (such as a distro kernel with backported features)
> > > libhugetlbfs
> > > will be wrong about t
On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 15:43 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 09:39:29PM +, Adam Litke wrote:
> > In some cases (such as a distro kernel with backported features)
> > libhugetlbfs
> > will be wrong about the presence of a feature. In these rare cases it will
> > be
> > use
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 09:39:29PM +, Adam Litke wrote:
> In some cases (such as a distro kernel with backported features) libhugetlbfs
> will be wrong about the presence of a feature. In these rare cases it will be
> useful to tell the library whether or not the feature is present in the
> r
In some cases (such as a distro kernel with backported features) libhugetlbfs
will be wrong about the presence of a feature. In these rare cases it will be
useful to tell the library whether or not the feature is present in the running
kernel.
Add a string field to 'struct feature' which contains
