Re: [Libhugetlbfs-devel] version 1.3 vs 2.12 vs current

2012-06-17 Thread Eric B Munson
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:48:47 -0400, starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote: > Mostly answered these myself. Posting > to help future searchers: > > (1) yes > > (2) yes > > In both cases it seems one should always set > HUGETLB_MORECORE=yes in the environment as > I don't see how that can be made the d

Re: [Libhugetlbfs-devel] version 1.3 vs 2.12 vs current

2012-06-15 Thread starlight . 2012q2
Mostly answered these myself. Posting to help future searchers: (1) yes (2) yes In both cases it seems one should always set HUGETLB_MORECORE=yes in the environment as I don't see how that can be made the default when linking executables. (3) don't know; doesn't seem worth the trouble to t

[Libhugetlbfs-devel] version 1.3 vs 2.12 vs current

2012-06-13 Thread starlight . 2012q2
Hello, I'm interested in how the different versions behave and relate to each other. Have an app that is well suited to hugepages and has straightforward linking. This app already supports creating it's own work areas in hugepage shared memory segments. Looking to get as much code and malloc int