On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 05:14:59PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 03:24:22PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 09:02:18PM +, Eric B. Munson wrote:
> > > elflink.c tests slice boundaries for all architectures, but this is
> > > not necessary on x86[_64] a
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 03:24:22PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 09:02:18PM +, Eric B. Munson wrote:
> > elflink.c tests slice boundaries for all architectures, but this is
> > not necessary on x86[_64] as there are no rules for placement of
> > huge pages with respect to
On Mon, 08 Feb 2010, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 09:02:18PM +, Eric B. Munson wrote:
> > elflink.c tests slice boundaries for all architectures, but this is
> > not necessary on x86[_64] as there are no rules for placement of
> > huge pages with respect to small pages. This
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 09:02:18PM +, Eric B. Munson wrote:
> elflink.c tests slice boundaries for all architectures, but this is
> not necessary on x86[_64] as there are no rules for placement of
> huge pages with respect to small pages. This patch addes a define
> that will skip this check o
