On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 11:27:59PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 10.01.2008 [14:53:51 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 09:12:56PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > counters: update to new sysctl
> > >
> > > To allow the interface to be more flexible, I changed
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 14:53 +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 09:12:56PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > counters: update to new sysctl
> >
> > To allow the interface to be more flexible, I changed the upstream
> > sysctl, /proc/sys/vm/hugetlb_dynamic_pool to
> > /proc/sy
On 10.01.2008 [14:53:51 +1100], David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 09:12:56PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > counters: update to new sysctl
> >
> > To allow the interface to be more flexible, I changed the upstream
> > sysctl, /proc/sys/vm/hugetlb_dynamic_pool to
> > /proc/sys/vm
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 09:12:56PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> counters: update to new sysctl
>
> To allow the interface to be more flexible, I changed the upstream
> sysctl, /proc/sys/vm/hugetlb_dynamic_pool to
> /proc/sys/vm/nr_overcommit_hugepages. This change needs to be reflected
> in
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 21:12 -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> counters: update to new sysctl
>
> To allow the interface to be more flexible, I changed the upstream
> sysctl, /proc/sys/vm/hugetlb_dynamic_pool to
> /proc/sys/vm/nr_overcommit_hugepages. This change needs to be reflected
> in the c