On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Benjamin Kirk wrote:
>> The hard (or at least tedious) part may be fixing our I/O classes to
>> write out and read in solutions with per-subdomain variables. I'm not
>> familiar with the nitty-gritty details of our output formats, but I
>> wouldn't be surprised if they didn'
> The hard (or at least tedious) part may be fixing our I/O classes to
> write out and read in solutions with per-subdomain variables. I'm not
> familiar with the nitty-gritty details of our output formats, but I
> wouldn't be surprised if they didn't all support such a thing.
I'm thinking for m
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Roy Stogner wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
>> This is a neat approach, which I could use myself in a separate problem.
>> One issue though: how do I get, say, T to be 0 on domain A, when it is
>> non-zero at nodes on the A-B boundary? Do you have any e
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> This is a neat approach, which I could use myself in a separate problem.
> One issue though: how do I get, say, T to be 0 on domain A, when it is
> non-zero at nodes on the A-B boundary? Do you have any examples?
No examples. I'd try to add a new c
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, John Peterson wrote:
> Either of you know if it's possible in svn to do "backporting" of
> changes? I.e. Can I check in a change to an old, already-tagged
> revision? I searched around on the web a bit but didn't come up with
> anything promising.
I don't think so; isn't th
