On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Tim Kroeger wrote:
Update: It doesn't crash any more. With the patch that I sent you in the
previous mail, it seems to work.
That's interesting. Did you ever track down the source of the
problem? The patch you provided looks like it could have fixed some
inaccuracy bugs
> wrote:
>> is that these tend to be more "industrial-type" applications, where
>> higher-order elements are often not used for various reasons (non-smooth
>> solutions, sharp complex geometry, etc...)
>
> In fact, hp-fem performs the best exactly with solutions that are both
> non-smooth and sha
Hi,
I CCed to our hpfem list, so that people in our group can have a look
at this too.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Roy Stogner
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Ondrej Certik wrot
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> That's awesome that you are interested in this. At this moment, I am
> quite busy with other things, but I am very interested in this
> comparison. Does the isotropic hp-adaptivity work in 3d?
It works for any elements we've got hierarchic basis functio
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Ondrej Certik wrote:
If I find time, I'd like to create Python interface to libmesh,
because I used it in the past and I would like to compare libmesh
h-adaptivity with our hp
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>> If I find time, I'd like to create Python interface to libmesh,
>> because I used it in the past and I would like to compare libmesh
>> h-adaptivity with our hp-adaptivity.
>
> If you're already
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> If I find time, I'd like to create Python interface to libmesh,
> because I used it in the past and I would like to compare libmesh
> h-adaptivity with our hp-adaptivity.
If you're already doing that, you might want to go one step farther
and compare l
Dear Roy,
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Tim Kroeger wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Tim Kroeger wrote:
>
>> I'm currently trying to test the ghosted vectors on my application,
>> but the queue on the cluster is full, so I have to wait.
>
> Update: My application crashes with the ghosted vectors, but I'm not
Dear Roy,
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Tim Kroeger wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Tim Kroeger wrote:
Besides, this can't be the right fix, can it? Why should any parallel
communication be required to copy one consistent ghosted vector to
another? It seems as if VecCopy is simply failing to copy the wh
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Roy Stogner
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Vijay S. Mahadevan wrote:
>>>
I understand that all the developers are doing your PhDs
>>>
>>> It's gotte
10 matches
Mail list logo
