On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 14:48, John Peterson wrote:
> Hmm... I think there used to be. We used to need to define
>
> EXTERN_C_FOR_PETSC_BEGIN
> EXTERN_C_FOR_PETSC_END
>
> inside petsc_macro.h, before we could include any other petsc headers.
> (At some point the petsc headers began extern C'ing
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:49, John Peterson wrote:
>>
>> I think it's because petsc_macro.h is #include'd *before* the relevant
>> petsc header, so the macro is defined before the extern XXDestroy
>> functions are declared, at which point they ge
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> John, double-check me on this:
>
> I believe the PYRAMID5 in Lorenzo's patch is wrong - the Pyramid5 we
> use, going by both my own hazy memory and by the ::shape() equations
> in fe_lagrange_shape_3D.C, has points 0-3 in the zeta=0 plane, not
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Lorenzo Alessio Botti wrote:
> here is a patch to avoid inverse maps on sides reinit.
> I hope that the main developers will consider it and
> have some time to give it a look since it might break a lot of code...
Aha, so it might. You're adding a new method that can make D
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:49, John Peterson wrote:
> I think it's because petsc_macro.h is #include'd *before* the relevant
> petsc header, so the macro is defined before the extern XXDestroy
> functions are declared, at which point they get macro-fied...?
>
Hmm, I wonder why this would be diffe
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, John Peterson wrote:
>
>> I can commit these patches unless someone else is already in the
>> process of doing it...
>
> I'm still catching up on older stuff, and at first glance don't see
> any problems here; go for it.
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, John Peterson wrote:
> I can commit these patches unless someone else is already in the
> process of doing it...
I'm still catching up on older stuff, and at first glance don't see
any problems here; go for it.
---
Roy
I can commit these patches unless someone else is already in the
process of doing it...
--
John
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Jed Brown wrote:
> ---
> include/numerics/petsc_macro.h | 10 +
> include/numerics/petsc_vector.h | 2 +-
> src/numerics/petsc_matrix.C
We didn't have a test for that before - one of our post-docs ran into
this. But now, we do have such a test.
--
David
Roy Stogner wrote on 08/01/2011 09:26:03 AM:
>
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, David Andrs wrote:
>
> > We bumped into an issue with XDA restart here at INL. We ran a
> > simulation
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, David Andrs wrote:
> We bumped into an issue with XDA restart here at INL. We ran a
> simulation that had one system in EquationSystems object and we
> saved the result (as XDA). Then we wanted to restart with more
> variables but also with more systems in the EquationSystems
10 matches
Mail list logo
