Re: [Libmesh-devel] Two small patches for SLEPc-dev

2011-09-01 Thread Roy Stogner
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, John Peterson wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Vijay S. Mahadevan wrote: > >> Also, I find it strange that the Make.common.in section for SLEPc >> computes PETSC_LIB variable. It looks more like a copy-paste error >> from the PETSc section. Should it not be SLEPC_LI

Re: [Libmesh-devel] Two small patches for SLEPc-dev

2011-09-01 Thread Vijay S. Mahadevan
Ah yes. That must have stemmed because of my typo earlier. Thanks for checking. Vijay On Sep 1, 2011 5:11 PM, "Roy Stogner" wrote: > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Vijay S. Mahadevan wrote: > >> And the other is related to the recent change in PETSc where the >> *Destroy() take the address of the object

Re: [Libmesh-devel] Two small patches for SLEPc-dev

2011-09-01 Thread Roy Stogner
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Vijay S. Mahadevan wrote: > And the other is related to the recent change in PETSc where the > *Destroy() take the address of the object which has been propagated > in SLEPc to maintain consistency. libMesh now fails to build for me with SLEPc 3.1.0.4 - I presume that, since