(sorry to top-reply, damn phone...)
I also was originally planning for the most common case - in fact there are no
constraints for the current element, hence no copy is required...
So am I right that the most pressing library change required is to update the
documentation?
-Ben
On Sep 28,
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, David Andrs wrote:
> We ran into an issue with our framework here at INL when forming full
> jacobian matrix as a preconditioner with AMR. What we hit
> in our problem was the different size of the dense matrix (local jacobian
> contributions) and the dof indices array. I t
Hi!
We ran into an issue with our framework here at INL when forming full
jacobian matrix as a preconditioner with AMR. What we hit in our problem
was the different size of the dense matrix (local jacobian contributions)
and the dof indices array. I traced the problem down to the level of
DofM
Roy Stogner wrote on 09/20/2011 08:01:23 AM:
>
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Minq Q wrote:
>
> > When I tried to config libmesh with trilinos (version 4847) I got
> this error:
> >
> > checking for /prog/trilinos/10.4.1/mpi/opt/include/Makefile.
> export.Trilinos... yes
> > <<< Configuring library w
Roy Stogner wrote on 09/23/2011 01:53:58 PM:
>
>
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> > There's a bug here: you forgot to change PetscNonlinearSolver to
> > NoxNonlinearSolver in a couple START_LOG lines.
>
> One more serious bug, too: there's a use of libmesh_cast_ref which
> breaks
