On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
>> Any thoughts on this? For now I could get away with just making the data
>> members protected but in the long run we could avoid more user problems by
>> making some of the functions virtual. Do you think libMesh would have any
>> use
>
> Any thoughts on this? For now I could get away with just making the data
> members protected but in the long run we could avoid more user problems by
> making some of the functions virtual. Do you think libMesh would have any use
> for some of the functions we have implemented in our version of
Roy,
Long ago we (the MOOSE project) extended libMesh's Parameters class to make it
easier for end users to interact with our Parser and to use Parameters objects
with a richer interface for user documentation. We added a bunch of additional
data structures to manage the state of a parameters
