>> I have refactored almost all of them, and your latest checkin is causing a
>> bunch of conflicts and I want to make sure I test them properly when merging
>> that change into the automake branch.
>
> Email me a patch against the branch HEAD, and I'll give it a shot?
That would be awesome. I w
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> how did you invoke the cross compiler to test the m4 macros you updated?
Well, first you need to have a cross compiler. ;-)
We got our hands on some Many Integrated Core (MIC) test hardware:
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/archit
OK, it's in.
I like this example because the Lagrange multiplier has a simple
physical interpretation: it's the traction required to satisfy the
constraint.
David
On 03/29/2012 08:27 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> I haven't looked at it yet but my general comment is by all means mor
how did you invoke the cross compiler to test the m4 macros you updated?
I have refactored almost all of them, and your latest checkin is causing a
bunch of conflicts and I want to make sure I test them properly when merging
that change into the automake branch.
-
Ben
---
I haven't looked at it yet but my general comment is by all means more examples
are better... We can always rearrange later, but adding content is hugely
appreciated.
On Mar 29, 2012, at 7:23 PM, "David Knezevic"
wrote:
> I was at a COMSOL junket today, and they said they have a cool fe
I was at a COMSOL junket today, and they said they have a cool feature
that allows you to enforce constraints. Then they showed a constraint
example of a uniformly loaded 2D cantilever, where you want to figure
out what upward force is required on the free boundary of the cantilever
to obtain z
