On 11/14/2012 08:46 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2012, at 7:43 PM, David Knezevic
> wrote:
>
>> On 11/14/2012 04:10 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>>> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, David Knezevic wrote:
>>>
However, I didn't want to check it in right away since it breaks some
tests
On Nov 14, 2012, at 7:43 PM, David Knezevic wrote:
>
> On 11/14/2012 04:10 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, David Knezevic wrote:
>>
>>> However, I didn't want to check it in right away since it breaks some
>>> tests with 0.8.0 around the corner. I was wondering if you might
On 11/14/2012 04:10 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, David Knezevic wrote:
>
>> However, I didn't want to check it in right away since it breaks some
>> tests with 0.8.0 around the corner. I was wondering if you might run
>> it through buildbot etc, and if it looks good at your en
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, David Knezevic wrote:
> However, I didn't want to check it in right away since it breaks some tests
> with 0.8.0 around the corner. I was wondering if you might run it through
> buildbot etc, and if it looks good at your end then I'd like to check it in
> before 0.8.0 is f
On 11/14/2012 09:23 AM, Paul T. Bauman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311)
mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Is this a recent regression or has it been there a while?
I don't think it's a regression because I don't think the
functionality was ever
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Is this a recent regression or has it been there a while?
>
I don't think it's a regression because I don't think the functionality was
ever there. Am I mistaken?
> Clearly it needs to be fixed bu
On Nov 13, 2012, at 9:37 PM, "Paul T. Bauman" wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:16 PM, David Knezevic
> wrote:
>
>> When I run miscellaneous_ex2 and view the results in paraview I get
>> nonsensical plots, whereas it works fine if I change the output format
>> from ExodusII to GMV.
>>
>> Is it
