Re: [Libmesh-devel] FEMContext::pre_fe_reinit

2013-06-20 Thread David Knezevic
On 06/21/2013 07:26 AM, Paul T. Bauman wrote: Only other thing that occurs to me is that it could be related to the ALE stuff Roy had started on. That way same method can deal with both the "primary" system and the mesh system. OK, that makes sense. I always pass the cached system pre_fe_reini

Re: [Libmesh-devel] FEMContext::pre_fe_reinit

2013-06-20 Thread Paul T. Bauman
Derp. Only other thing that occurs to me is that it could be related to the ALE stuff Roy had started on. That way same method can deal with both the "primary" system and the mesh system. On Jun 20, 2013, at 5:51 PM, David Knezevic wrote: > On 06/21/2013 03:16 AM, Paul T. Bauman wrote: >> R

Re: [Libmesh-devel] FEMContext::pre_fe_reinit

2013-06-20 Thread David Knezevic
On 06/21/2013 03:16 AM, Paul T. Bauman wrote: Roy's going to have to chime in here on the decision, but it looks like the cached System reference is private in DiffContext, so FEMContext can't access it. I'd be in favor of moving it to protected. There's a const accessor in DiffContext: const

Re: [Libmesh-devel] FEMContext::pre_fe_reinit

2013-06-20 Thread Paul T. Bauman
Roy's going to have to chime in here on the decision, but it looks like the cached System reference is private in DiffContext, so FEMContext can't access it. I'd be in favor of moving it to protected. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:33 AM, David Knezevic wrote: > Random question: why does FEMContext::