Hi Ben,
Yeah, I think the issue I'm seeing is related to blocked dof support,
since it looks like you had to add "-mat_new_nonzero_allocation_err
false" in c08baf8a6f41edca3b3422b897687361e73bbee3. The commit message
there was "avoid preallocation error that seems to be triggered by
blocked ma
On 07/04/2013 02:44 AM, Paul T. Bauman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311)
mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
It could also be blocked dof support as well. I'm on my way out of
town for the holiday but will try to follow this and help the best
I
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) <
[email protected]> wrote:
> It could also be blocked dof support as well. I'm on my way out of town
> for the holiday but will try to follow this and help the best I can.
>
If David is using the LAGRANGE_VEC elements (he said vec
It could also be blocked dof support as well. I'm on my way out of town for the
holiday but will try to follow this and help the best I can.
-Ben
On Jul 3, 2013, at 12:49 PM, "David Knezevic"
wrote:
> OK, I see that it also effects reduced_basis_ex5. It might be related to
> the DFEMContext
One more comment before I go to sleep... I think the issue is with
vector-valued RB problems (hence reduced_basis_ex5 and ex6). Not sure
yet why it's having sparsity pattern issues...
On 07/04/2013 01:49 AM, David Knezevic wrote:
> OK, I see that it also effects reduced_basis_ex5. It might be
OK, I see that it also effects reduced_basis_ex5. It might be related to
the DFEMContext stuff that I added. Let me have a closer look...
On 07/04/2013 01:28 AM, David Knezevic wrote:
> I have an issue: It appears that reduced_basis_ex6 now requires
> -mat_new_nonzero_allocation_err false" othe
I have an issue: It appears that reduced_basis_ex6 now requires
-mat_new_nonzero_allocation_err false" otherwise we get an error like
"New nonzero at (0,2) caused a malloc!".
This wasn't needed previously, did something change? Note that this
example using a CouplingMatrix. (I use the same func
Paul's last patch is in and looks good; I think we're good to go on
0.9.2-rc2 or even 0.9.2 if everyone's ready.
---
Roy
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows
