> wrote:
>> is that these tend to be more "industrial-type" applications, where
>> higher-order elements are often not used for various reasons (non-smooth
>> solutions, sharp complex geometry, etc...)
>
> In fact, hp-fem performs the best exactly with solutions that are both
> non-smooth and sha
Hi,
I CCed to our hpfem list, so that people in our group can have a look
at this too.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Roy Stogner
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Ondrej Certik wrot
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> That's awesome that you are interested in this. At this moment, I am
> quite busy with other things, but I am very interested in this
> comparison. Does the isotropic hp-adaptivity work in 3d?
It works for any elements we've got hierarchic basis functio
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Ondrej Certik wrote:
If I find time, I'd like to create Python interface to libmesh,
because I used it in the past and I would like to compare libmesh
h-adaptivity with our hp
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>> If I find time, I'd like to create Python interface to libmesh,
>> because I used it in the past and I would like to compare libmesh
>> h-adaptivity with our hp-adaptivity.
>
> If you're already
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> If I find time, I'd like to create Python interface to libmesh,
> because I used it in the past and I would like to compare libmesh
> h-adaptivity with our hp-adaptivity.
If you're already doing that, you might want to go one step farther
and compare l
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Roy Stogner
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Vijay S. Mahadevan wrote:
>>>
I understand that all the developers are doing your PhDs
>>>
>>> It's gotte
>>> I understand that all the developers are doing your PhDs
>>
>> It's gotten worse than that now that the primary developers are all
>> graduated. E.g. the adaptive p refinement was something I did on a
>> lark as a break from my dissertation research. It's harder to find
>> time for things li
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Vijay S. Mahadevan wrote:
I understand that all the developers are doing your PhDs
It's gotten worse than that now that the primary developers are all
graduated. E.g. the a
Hi Roy!
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Vijay S. Mahadevan wrote:
>
>> I understand that all the developers are doing your PhDs
>
> It's gotten worse than that now that the primary developers are all
> graduated. E.g. the adaptive p refinement was so
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Vijay S. Mahadevan wrote:
> I understand that all the developers are doing your PhDs
It's gotten worse than that now that the primary developers are all
graduated. E.g. the adaptive p refinement was something I did on a
lark as a break from my dissertation research. It's h
> There are higher order elements, just not higher order Lagrange
> elements; try the HIERARCHIC basis instead if you want C0 higher order
> polynomials. You can even do adaptive p refinement with them.
> (probably hp, too, but I wouldn't guarantee that's working)
Thanks for the quick reply. I di
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Vijay S. Mahadevan wrote:
> Are there any higher than second order Finite Elements in Libmesh ? I
> obviously do not see them in the class docs but just wondering if
> there was some trick to apply say a 5th order Lagrange basis to a
> QUAD4 elem. Then would Libmesh automatic
Hi,
Are there any higher than second order Finite Elements in Libmesh ? I
obviously do not see them in the class docs but just wondering if
there was some trick to apply say a 5th order Lagrange basis to a
QUAD4 elem. Then would Libmesh automatically create the extra dofs
needed to make this uniso
14 matches
Mail list logo
