On Fri, 25 May 2012, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> I'm a little confused by the ouput-iterator-to int bit. I'm guessing you're
> looking for more abstraction in Parallel::?
Exactly. Not sure what we'd want to use there other than a
back_inserter for vector, but who knows?
> But are you
You won't be stepping on my toes, but looks like Derek has bigger feet.. ;-P
> What I'd like to do for a final design is write Parallel::
> specializations for data types T* (and containers and possibly
> iterator ranges of same). Parallel:: would assume methods
> T::packed_size() for deciding ho
Oh crap! I'll do some testing
Derek
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012, Derek Gaston wrote:
>
> Just a heads up... I'm using all of that code extensively to do contact
>> ghosting with ParallelMesh. So whatever you do will probably break my
>> stuf
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Derek Gaston wrote:
Just a heads up... I'm using all of that code extensively to do contact
ghosting with ParallelMesh. So whatever you do will probably break my
stuff. I'm not telling you this to keep you from it (my code needs a good
refactor anyway... so this will be a
Just a heads up... I'm using all of that code extensively to do contact
ghosting with ParallelMesh. So whatever you do will probably break my
stuff. I'm not telling you this to keep you from it (my code needs a good
refactor anyway... so this will be a good opportunity to do that) just
letting yo
On Thu, 24 May 2012, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> This is great - let me know if there is anything in particular I can
> do to help.
A sanity check on my upcoming refactoring would be nice; and an
assurance that I'm not going to be stepping on your toes by deleting
two of your helper clas
This is great - let me know if there is anything in particular I can do to
help.
-Ben
On May 24, 2012, at 9:18 PM, "Roy Stogner" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 May 2012, Derek Gaston wrote:
>
>> Awesome! We're now testing everything in parallel and with parallel
>> mesh on our side... So we'll k
On Thu, 24 May 2012, Derek Gaston wrote:
> Awesome! We're now testing everything in parallel and with parallel
> mesh on our side... So we'll keep you updated if we see anything
> fishy...
Thanks! We have the libMesh examples on ParallelMesh running through
BuildBot, but that only catches asse
Awesome! We're now testing everything in parallel and with parallel
mesh on our side... So we'll keep you updated if we see anything
fishy...
Derek
Sent from my iPhone
On May 24, 2012, at 5:03 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> I'm going to have a few major changes going into the svn head, one
> imme
I'm going to have a few major changes going into the svn head, one
immediately, the next hopefully shortly, to get redistribution of
populated DofObjects working. I won't commit anything that breaks
ParallelMesh in my tests, but that doesn't guarantee it won't break
ParallelMesh (or even SerialMe
10 matches
Mail list logo
