Derek Gaston wrote:
> Wouldn't the above loop over a _lot_ (like millions in some cases) of
> unnecessary nodes when using Serial mesh?
At the moment, I think so, but that just makes it a wash efficiency-wise
right now, and it wouldn't be hard to adjust our iterators to be more
efficient on a
> Wouldn't the above loop over a _lot_ (like millions in some cases) of
> unnecessary nodes when using Serial mesh?
Well, the exact same thing happens when you loop over active_local_elements.
For the case of a serial mesh (or any mesh for that matter) you are *really*
iterating over all the eleme
On Nov 6, 2008, at 8:57 AM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG) wrote:
Right...
The fastest thing to do may be to loop over all local elements, and
only look at their internal degreees of freedom, which are
guaranteed to be owned by the processor. Then you can loop over all
local nodes. Should be fas
x27;s nodes with-embedded-if-test...
-Ben
-Original Message-
From: Derek Gaston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 11/6/2008 9:49 AM
To: Roy Stogner
Cc: libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Libmesh-devel] Local Dof Indices
aha - thanks Roy... that's what I needed.
Der
aha - thanks Roy... that's what I needed.
Derek
On Nov 6, 2008, at 8:49 AM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2008, Derek Gaston wrote:
>
>> So... I'm putting together a capability for finding the local dof
>> indices for a variable and I've got a question about who owns
>> what.
>>
>
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008, Derek Gaston wrote:
> So... I'm putting together a capability for finding the local dof
> indices for a variable and I've got a question about who owns what.
>
> If a processor owns an element does it own all of the degrees of
> freedom on that element?
It owns any D
So... I'm putting together a capability for finding the local dof
indices for a variable and I've got a question about who owns what.
If a processor owns an element does it own all of the degrees of
freedom on that element?
I guess I'm having trouble figuring out how to get a unique s
