On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 4:58 AM, Vetter Roman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Cody Permann wrote:
>
>> I'm pretty sure "if (_snes)" is guaranteed to be false after a call to
>> SNESDestroy, but I could be wrong about that... Vetter since you are
>> the one actually using this functionali
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Cody Permann wrote:
> I'm pretty sure "if (_snes)" is guaranteed to be false after a call to
> SNESDestroy, but I could be wrong about that... Vetter since you are
> the one actually using this functionality could you please let me know
> if it's still working OK fo
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Vetter Roman wrote:
>>> I've just checked in a change which will hopefully please both the
>>> people who need to call this->clear() at the end of
>>> PetscNonlinearSolver::solve and the people who want
>>> PetscNonlinearSolver::print_converged_reason() to work.
>> I've just checked in a change which will hopefully please both the
>> people who need to call this->clear() at the end of
>> PetscNonlinearSolver::solve and the people who want
>> PetscNonlinearSolver::print_converged_reason() to work. The basic
>> idea is just to store the SNESConvergedReason
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, John Peterson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Roy Stogner wrote:
Okay, instead of this:
---
if (!elem->old_dof_object ||
!elem->old_dof_object->has_dofs(system.number()))
continue;
---
Try this:
---
bool missing_old_dofs = !elem->old_dof_object ||
(elem->ha
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Roy Stogner wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, John Peterson wrote:
>
>> I've just checked in a change which will hopefully please both the
>> people who need to call this->clear() at the end of
>> PetscNonlinearSolver::solve and the people who want
>> PetscNonlinearSo
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, John Peterson wrote:
> I've just checked in a change which will hopefully please both the
> people who need to call this->clear() at the end of
> PetscNonlinearSolver::solve and the people who want
> PetscNonlinearSolver::print_converged_reason() to work. The basic
> idea is
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Cody Permann wrote:
> The mailing list has been very busy the last few weeks and the team here at
> the INL has fallen a little bit behind on libMesh revisions. It turns out
> that a couple of the commits over the last week have caused us some issues.
>
> It appe
The mailing list has been very busy the last few weeks and the team here at the
INL has fallen a little bit behind on libMesh revisions. It turns out that a
couple of the commits over the last week have caused us some issues.
It appears that a number of our regression tests are failing with th
