Re: [Libmesh-devel] libMesh multi-method support

2012-11-30 Thread Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311)
On Nov 30, 2012, at 3:48 PM, Derek Gaston wrote: > Sounds great Ben. Do we still need to "make install" to get > make.common? It would be awesome if we didn't… At present yes. I'll work with John some next week though to see if you could build moose straight from the uninstalled e.g. libmesh

Re: [Libmesh-devel] libMesh multi-method support

2012-11-30 Thread Derek Gaston
Sounds great Ben. Do we still need to "make install" to get make.common? It would be awesome if we didn't... Derek Sent from my iPhone On Nov 30, 2012, at 1:44 PM, "Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311)" wrote: > All - > > With r6480 I have merged back the libmesh.automake branch, with the new > multi

[Libmesh-devel] libMesh multi-method support

2012-11-30 Thread Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311)
All - With r6480 I have merged back the libmesh.automake branch, with the new multi-method support. If you build in your top-level directory, do a 'make distclean' before updating to make sure that any deprecated, derived makefiles are removed before the update orphans them. If you build in s