>> We'd clearly prefer to use the directory structure, but I don't know
>> of a way to do that with automake.
>
> I'll continue to work this. I know how to have a single 'make' build
> *everything* at once - opt, dbg,devel,etc... but that might be too much in
> the other direction.
>
> What woul
Yeah I use macports to give my machine some more respectability... ;-)
On Mar 5, 2012, at 8:02 PM, "Derek Gaston"
mailto:fried...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I'll spend more time with it tomorrow (how did it not work on Lion or
Snowleopard today? I thought you develop, at least partially, using a Mac
I'll spend more time with it tomorrow (how did it not work on Lion or
Snowleopard today? I thought you develop, at least partially, using a Mac
laptop!).
I'm sure we can work something out here. I know I'm coming off like a
crazy man... this whole thing just threw me for a loop. I have so many
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Derek Gaston wrote:
>
>> First: Thanks for the good reply. Good to see what's in your head on this
>> subject. ;-)
>
> Whoa, whoa, let's cut down on the politeness level, everyone. I've
> already decided that further disagreements here ought to be settled
> via physical co
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Derek Gaston wrote:
First: Thanks for the good reply. Good to see what's in your head on this
subject. ;-)
Whoa, whoa, let's cut down on the politeness level, everyone. I've
already decided that further disagreements here ought to be settled
via physical combat, and if
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Derek Gaston wrote:
>
> Yikes about having to install it. Where to install it? Right now
> everything is self-contained…
>
> I think we need to get you access to MOOSE so you can see what we're
> dealing with here. As things are they work perfectly… if you had t
First: Thanks for the good reply. Good to see what's in your head on this
subject. ;-)
On Mar 5, 2012, at 3:07 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> Really - a no go? I guess then 'svn add' is simply asking too much of a
> developer too?
I'm just a believer in the "only store things in on
On 3/5/12 1:08 PM, "Derek Gaston" wrote:
> FirstlyŠ I'm still against this idea. I think it's adding complication to
> something that currently works well for the majority of users and use cases.
Understood.
> On Mar 5, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
>
> (1) files must
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> As part of this process I have also cleaned up almost all of our M4 sources
> for consistency and brevity.
Possibly at some cost in correctness? Autodetection is now failing
for me on vtk and fparser (?!).
---
Roy
---
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311)
wrote:
> Indeed - ill add some minimum version checking and turn off anything
> unnecessary.
>
> While I'm at it, what is your automake and libtool (or glibtool on the Mac)
> version?
>
> I intend to try successively older versions unti
Exactly... it fails on Lion as well. This is exactly the kind of stuff I'm
worried about. We have users using ridiculously old OSes in secure
environments where they can't just easily upgrade something...
Here are the errors on Lion:
[gastdr][~/projects/libmesh.automake]> ./bootstrap
autoreconf
Indeed - ill add some minimum version checking and turn off anything
unnecessary.
While I'm at it, what is your automake and libtool (or glibtool on the Mac)
version?
I intend to try successively older versions until I find what is really needed.
-Ben
On Mar 5, 2012, at 1:09 PM, "John Peter
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311)
wrote:
> This coming along quite nicely I think. My last step is to clean out the
> Make.common definitions and then test including it in client projects. I
> started on that over the weekend and don't see any issues with maintaining
>
Firstly… I'm still against this idea. I think it's adding complication to
something that currently works well for the majority of users and use cases.
On Mar 5, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> (1) files must manually be added to ./Makefile.am and ./include/Makefile.am
Fo
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:
> Roy - a long time ago you hoped using automake might help with IDE
> integration - is that something you are still interested in, and if
> so might you check it out?
Well, this is ironic. KDevelop4 appears to have dropped their
automake-sp
This coming along quite nicely I think. My last step is to clean out the
Make.common definitions and then test including it in client projects. I
started on that over the weekend and don't see any issues with maintaining that
functionality.
The biggest changes from the developer's perspective
16 matches
Mail list logo
