Holy smokes did I drop the ball. No excuses I just flat didn't do this.
Now I'm finally getting back around to doing some Trilinos work... and I
_knew_ that there had been a patch for this stuff but it wasn't in the code!
So I went digging through my email and found out that I seriously screw
Thanks Norbert! This is something that's been on my list for a while
now.
I'm finishing up an abstract for a conference today... then I'll take
a look at this and get it committed... and then I should be freed up
to do some work on this stuff myself.
Thanks again,
Derek
On Oct 29, 2008, a
Hi Derek,
Attached is another small Trilinos patch. Essentially, it sets the
various Aztec/NOX parameters to the same values as the PETSc solver does.
Additionally, there seems to be an inconsistency in Trilinos regarding
the size of the Krylov subspace. The docs state the default value is 30
(as
