On May 31, 2013, at 4:04 AM, Lorenzo Alessio Botti
wrote:
> I don't know if it is the "correct" way to do it but the memory footprint has
> not changed.
> I'm also interested in knowing if the memory savings take place on the
> libMesh side or on the PETSc side, or on both sides.
That's wha
I tried to modify dof_map.h as follows
unsigned int block_size() const
{
#ifdef LIBMESH_ENABLE_BLOCKED_STORAGE
return (this->has_blocked_representation() ? this->n_variables()*4 : 1);
#else
return 1;
#endif
}
I don't know if it is the "correct" way to do it but the memory footprint
