On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Michael Povolotskyi
wrote:
>
>
May be meanwhile I learn how to use git.
>
This is definitely the way to go, especially if you need to contribute back
to upstream at some point. Let us know if you have any questions.
--
John
I think I've had too much coffee this afternoon... let's try that last
email again... this time in English:
Sorry for one more email on this topic... but if you want to see how we
track libMesh revisions look at our repo: https://github.com/idaholab/moose
See that libMesh directory? Notice how
Sorry for one more email on this topic... but if you want to see how we
track libMesh revisions look at our repo: https://github.com/idaholab/moose
See that libMesh directory? Notice how it has a Git has right next to it?
We're using Git Submodules... and that hash the the current version of
lib
To be clear: we update libMesh about monthly... each time just updating to
HEAD in the Git repo...
Derek
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Derek Gaston wrote:
> Michael - can you really not use the Git version? A libMesh "release"
> really isn't much more special than any version in the Git rep
Michael - can you really not use the Git version? A libMesh "release"
really isn't much more special than any version in the Git repo... in fact
all it means is that it's usually behind on bug fixes
We've never used a "release" and we distribute libMesh to hundreds of
customers daily without
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
bugfix release for a regression this big. I'm swamped right now, but
> I'll try to get an 0.9.3.1 out next week. Any other fixes worth
> backporting while I'm at it?
>
I'm not sure how crazy you want to get with backporting bugfixes, but I
loo
On Fri, 9 May 2014, Michael Povolotskyi wrote:
> On 05/09/2014 11:25 AM, John Peterson wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Michael Povolotskyi
>> mailto:mpovo...@purdue.edu>> wrote:
>>
>> When the official release with the patch is going to happen?
>>
>>
>> Hard to say, we aren't on a
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Michael Povolotskyi wrote:
> When the official release with the patch is going to happen?
>
Hard to say, we aren't on a very regular release schedule.
And this wasn't a regression per se, so I don't think it's worth rushing an
official point release out the door.
