On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Roy Stogner wrote:
> We could use NumericVector::clone() and NumericVector::swap() to
> create a correct-but-inefficient "fallback" implementation, no?
>
Yes - good point. I think I'll go that direction for now.
Thanks,
Derek
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Derek Gaston wrote:
Both options are good in their own way. Option #1 should work for
all types of vectors without having to go code something up for each
one. Option #2 might be more optimal depending on the
implementation... but means that someone needs to go implement
